EVIM vs. TNGY
EVIM (Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EVIM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while TNGY is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise Capital. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. EVIM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
EVIM vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVIM achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than TNGY's 15.21% return.
EVIM
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVIM vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 1.40% | 6.07% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVIM and TNGY is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVIM vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
EVIM
TNGY
EVIM vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVIM | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVIM | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 1.15 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
EVIM vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVIM drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum TNGY drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIM and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVIM | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -8.86% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -3.92% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -2.18% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility
EVIM vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVIM | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 15.70% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 15.70% | -11.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 15.70% | -11.84% |
EVIM vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVIM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVIM vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
EVIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.56% | 0.78% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVIM and TNGY have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVIM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVIM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
EVIM has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
EVIM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TNGY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EVIM and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for EVIM and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer