PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIM vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIM vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVIM achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's 1.48% return.


EVIM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.05%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMUB

1D
0.02%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.70%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVIM vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
1.80%5.85%1.65%6.83%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
1.48%4.34%1.88%7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIM and JMUB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.85

The correlation between EVIM and JMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIM vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVIM
EVIM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EVIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVIM vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVIMJMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.52

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.25

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

7.74

+0.04

EVIM vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIM and JMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVIM vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIM drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum JMUB drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIM and JMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIMJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-12.50%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.55%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.38%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-2.50%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.74%

+0.22%

Volatility

EVIM vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) have volatilities of 0.70% and 0.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIMJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.69%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

1.87%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

2.40%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.83%

3.33%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.83%

4.13%

-0.30%

EVIM vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIM vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

EVIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than JMUB's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EVIM
Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF
3.53%3.58%3.56%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.59%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIM and JMUB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVIM has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to JMUB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIM dropped -4.23% vs JMUB's -12.50%.

On 1-year performance, EVIM leads with 7.43% vs 5.72% for JMUB. On fees, JMUB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVIM has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMUB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for EVIM.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.53% for EVIM.

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EVIM and 0.18% for JMUB.

EVIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIM and JMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer