EVIM vs. HYMB
EVIM (Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF) and HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. EVIM is actively managed, while HYMB is passively managed. Over the past year, EVIM returned 8.07% vs 7.43% for HYMB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVIM charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMB.
Performance
EVIM vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVIM achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return.
EVIM
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
EVIM vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 1.40% | 5.85% | 1.65% | 6.88% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 2.87% | 2.04% | 5.52% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVIM and HYMB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EVIM and HYMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVIM vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
EVIM
HYMB
EVIM vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVIM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.37 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.40 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 8.51 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVIM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.84 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 0.45 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
EVIM vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVIM drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIM and HYMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVIM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -29.57% | +25.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.05% | -3.11% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.04% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.88% | -3.81% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.88% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EVIM vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) is 0.85%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that EVIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVIM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 1.35% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.94% | 3.14% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81% | 4.05% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 6.66% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 11.36% | -7.50% |
EVIM vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVIM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVIM vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
EVIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.56% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVIM and HYMB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to EVIM (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIM dropped -4.23% vs HYMB's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, EVIM leads with 8.07% vs 7.43% for HYMB. On fees, EVIM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EVIM has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVIM has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVIM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.55% for EVIM.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for EVIM and 0.35% for HYMB.
EVIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVIM and HYMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer