PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIBX vs. ICMUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVIBX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than ICMUX's 2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EVIBX has underperformed ICMUX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while ICMUX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return.


EVIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.96%
6M
0.26%
YTD
0.58%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
4.70%
ALL TIME*
5.87%

ICMUX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.35%
YTD
2.85%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
5.73%
ALL TIME*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
0.58%8.21%6.57%10.67%-8.16%5.57%4.83%13.30%-2.77%6.03%
ICMUX
Intrepid Income Fund
2.85%8.16%10.43%10.90%-3.17%10.02%8.77%4.65%0.53%3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIBX and ICMUX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010

0.46

The correlation between EVIBX and ICMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIBX vs. ICMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVIBX
EVIBX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EVIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ICMUX
ICMUX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ICMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ICMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVIBXICMUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.79

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

4.83

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

16.75

-7.95

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the ICMUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIBX and ICMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIBX drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than ICMUX's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIBX and ICMUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIBXICMUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-8.77%

-28.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-1.34%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-3.11%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-5.64%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.06%

-8.77%

-12.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.11%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-0.73%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.39%

+0.12%

Volatility

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to Intrepid Income Fund (ICMUX) at 0.48%. This indicates that EVIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIBXICMUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.48%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.61%

1.45%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

1.94%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

2.65%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

2.57%

+2.80%

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIBX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ICMUX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIBX vs. ICMUX - Dividend Comparison

EVIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than ICMUX's 6.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
5.67%5.91%5.36%4.59%5.65%5.04%5.69%5.62%6.01%5.53%5.85%6.54%
ICMUX
Intrepid Income Fund
6.89%7.96%7.85%9.10%8.17%5.99%5.56%3.35%3.07%2.86%3.01%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIBX and ICMUX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVIBX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to ICMUX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIBX dropped -36.79% vs ICMUX's -8.77%.

ICMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIBX and ICMUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer