PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVIBX vs. EELDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVIBX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EVIBX has underperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 5.00%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.


EVIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
5.00%

EELDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.37%
YTD
7.53%
6M
8.52%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
1.02%8.21%6.57%10.67%-8.16%5.57%4.83%13.30%-2.77%6.03%
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
7.53%15.80%14.87%11.46%-6.14%1.55%7.44%18.34%-4.27%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EVIBX and EELDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.42

The correlation between EVIBX and EELDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVIBX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVIBX
EVIBX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EVIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EVIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EELDX
EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVIBXEELDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.44

-0.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

5.25

-2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

21.36

-7.84

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVIBX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVIBX drawdown since its inception was -36.79%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVIBX and EELDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVIBXEELDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.79%

-19.12%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.35%

-3.68%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-3.98%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.67%

-17.35%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.06%

-19.12%

-1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.23%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-2.89%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.90%

-0.44%

Volatility

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston (EVIBX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.76%. This indicates that EVIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVIBXEELDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.76%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

3.06%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.28%

3.51%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

4.62%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

4.73%

+0.67%

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVIBX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVIBX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

EVIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than EELDX's 10.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
10.69%9.44%8.58%9.02%9.17%7.87%7.71%7.86%8.16%7.90%4.12%1.65%
EVIBX
Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston
6.08%5.91%5.36%4.59%5.65%5.04%5.69%5.62%6.01%5.53%5.85%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVIBX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVIBX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to EELDX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVIBX dropped -36.79% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.50 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVIBX and EELDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer