PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVC vs. ATEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EVC vs. ATEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Entravision Communications Corporation (EVC) and Anterix Inc. (ATEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVC achieves a 285.22% return, which is significantly lower than ATEX's 338.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EVC has underperformed ATEX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while ATEX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


EVC

1D
-1.60%
1M
-15.40%
6M
270.07%
YTD
285.22%
1Y
426.76%
3Y*
53.68%
5Y*
20.28%
10Y*
8.74%
ALL TIME*
0.62%

ATEX

1D
2.83%
1M
-9.03%
6M
248.45%
YTD
338.16%
1Y
337.56%
3Y*
47.93%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
15.77%
ALL TIME*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.67M$36.11M$37.05M
$16.02M$16.63M$28.75M

EVC vs. ATEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVC
Entravision Communications Corporation
285.22%35.80%-37.56%-9.16%-27.83%151.06%12.21%-3.93%-57.29%4.85%
ATEX
Anterix Inc.
338.16%-28.82%-7.95%3.57%-45.25%56.28%-12.98%15.57%16.48%42.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EVC and ATEX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2015

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EVC:

$1.02B

ATEX:

$1.87B

EPS

EVC:

-$0.19

ATEX:

$4.83

PS Ratio

EVC:

1.85

ATEX:

394.78

PB Ratio

EVC:

16.39

ATEX:

6.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

EVC:

$552.71M

ATEX:

$4.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EVC:

$166.48M

ATEX:

$4.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

EVC:

$68.21M

ATEX:

-$10.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVC vs. ATEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVC
EVC Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEX
ATEX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ATEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVC vs. ATEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entravision Communications Corporation (EVC) and Anterix Inc. (ATEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVCATEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.62

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.29

14.04

+4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.58

41.11

+0.47

EVC vs. ATEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVC Sharpe Ratio is 3.59, which is lower than the ATEX Sharpe Ratio of 5.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVC and ATEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVC vs. ATEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVC drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than ATEX's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVC and ATEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVCATEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.26%

-72.27%

-26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.52%

-24.22%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.44%

-57.35%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.43%

-72.27%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.43%

-72.27%

-11.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.10%

-11.60%

-6.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.31%

-38.29%

-29.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.33%

8.26%

+2.07%

Volatility

EVC vs. ATEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Entravision Communications Corporation (EVC) is 15.45%, while Anterix Inc. (ATEX) has a volatility of 20.35%. This indicates that EVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVCATEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.45%

20.35%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.87%

47.63%

+36.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.98%

60.54%

+59.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.23%

45.81%

+28.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.55%

50.95%

+14.60%

Dividends

EVC vs. ATEX - Dividend Comparison

EVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, while ATEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATEX
Anterix Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EVC
Entravision Communications Corporation
1.81%6.83%8.51%4.80%2.08%1.47%4.55%7.63%6.87%2.27%1.79%1.38%

Financials

EVC vs. ATEX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Entravision Communications Corporation and Anterix Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EVC and ATEX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEX has higher volatility (20.35%) compared to EVC (15.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVC dropped -99.26% vs ATEX's -72.27%.

ATEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.63 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVC and ATEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer