PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin STOXX Europe 600 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (EUPA.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUPA.L achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly higher than FRIN.L's -10.53% return.


EUPA.L

1D
0.65%
1M
3.80%
YTD
4.38%
6M
5.66%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*

FRIN.L

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-10.53%
6M
-10.61%
1Y
-9.00%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EUPA.L
Franklin STOXX Europe 600 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF
4.38%11.10%2.65%13.53%-5.80%15.83%10.92%
FRIN.L
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-10.53%-4.08%12.58%14.76%3.17%26.55%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EUPA.L and FRIN.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020

0.36

The correlation between EUPA.L and FRIN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUPA.L
EUPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
EUPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EUPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIN.L
FRIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin STOXX Europe 600 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (EUPA.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUPA.LFRIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.91

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

-0.50

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.21

-1.14

+3.35

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the FRIN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUPA.L and FRIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUPA.LFRIN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

-0.64

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.31

+0.30

Drawdowns

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUPA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.43%, smaller than the maximum FRIN.L drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUPA.L and FRIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUPA.LFRIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-36.20%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-17.95%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.16%

-22.37%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.43%

-22.37%

+3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-18.75%

+15.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-7.14%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

7.91%

-4.04%

Volatility

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin STOXX Europe 600 Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF (EUPA.L) is 4.37%, while Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FRIN.L) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that EUPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUPA.LFRIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

5.74%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

11.82%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

14.04%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.52%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

19.41%

-4.94%

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUPA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIN.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUPA.L vs. FRIN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUPA.L nor FRIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUPA.L and FRIN.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUPA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUPA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FRIN.L.

EUPA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FRIN.L is Asia Pacific Equities. EUPA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while FRIN.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EUPA.L and 0.19% for FRIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUPA.L and FRIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer