EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE
EUPA.DE (Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)) and FLXU.DE (Franklin U.S. Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUPA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector, while FLXU.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUPA.DE returned 17.95%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for FLXU.DE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUPA.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FLXU.DE.
Performance
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUPA.DE achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.DE's 12.87% return.
EUPA.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXU.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 27.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EUPA.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) | 8.36% | 18.38% | 13.54% | 11.13% |
FLXU.DE Franklin U.S. Equity UCITS ETF | 12.87% | 8.49% | 16.79% | 8.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUPA.DE and FLXU.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUPA.DE
FLXU.DE
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) and Franklin U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUPA.DE | FLXU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.70 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 17.09 | -9.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUPA.DE | FLXU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.23 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.90 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUPA.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum FLXU.DE drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUPA.DE and FLXU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUPA.DE | FLXU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -32.92% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -5.76% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.28% | -23.04% | +12.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -0.15% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -3.92% | +2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 1.59% | +0.69% |
Volatility
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Franklin U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.DE) at 3.43%. This indicates that EUPA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUPA.DE | FLXU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.43% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 8.59% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 12.12% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 13.86% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 15.48% | -3.08% |
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUPA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXU.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUPA.DE vs. FLXU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUPA.DE nor FLXU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUPA.DE and FLXU.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXU.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXU.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.
EUPA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLXU.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector, while FLXU.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EUPA.DE and 0.25% for FLXU.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUPA.DE and FLXU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer