EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE
EUPA.DE (Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUPA.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector, while FLXC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUPA.DE returned 17.95%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for FLXC.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUPA.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUPA.DE achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
EUPA.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EUPA.DE Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) | 8.36% | 18.38% | 13.54% | 11.13% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUPA.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUPA.DE
FLXC.DE
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUPA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.06 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 0.31 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 0.64 | +6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUPA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.27 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.09 | +1.21 |
Drawdowns
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUPA.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.28%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUPA.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUPA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -55.61% | +45.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -15.19% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.28% | -24.70% | +14.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -30.89% | +28.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -27.95% | +26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 7.38% | -5.10% |
Volatility
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) is 3.63%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that EUPA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUPA.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 6.78% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 12.35% | -3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.84% | 17.78% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 26.71% | -14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 26.20% | -13.80% |
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUPA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUPA.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUPA.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUPA.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.
EUPA.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLXC.DE is China Equities. EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EUPA.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUPA.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer