PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUPA.DE achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than AMES.DE's 14.53% return.


EUPA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
8.38%
6M
8.85%
1Y
18.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMES.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
7.06%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.44%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
32.90%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EUPA.DE and AMES.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.55

The correlation between EUPA.DE and AMES.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUPA.DE
EUPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUPA.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.64

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

16.40

-8.51

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUPA.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUPA.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUPA.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUPA.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.20%

-40.98%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-9.95%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-0.10%

-2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-10.09%

+8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.82%

-0.46%

Volatility

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) is 3.55%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that EUPA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUPA.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.04%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

13.99%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

16.47%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

16.97%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.78%

18.42%

-6.64%

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUPA.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUPA.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUPA.DE nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUPA.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.

EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EUPA.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUPA.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer