EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE
EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) and XEMD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EUNZ.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility while XEMD.DE tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EUNZ.DE returned 11.07%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for XEMD.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUNZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XEMD.DE.
Performance
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNZ.DE achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD.DE's 28.06% return.
EUNZ.DE
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 6.20%
XEMD.DE
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 28.06%
- 6M
- 27.79%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 18.69% | -0.15% | 15.73% | 3.85% | -8.85% | 1.50% |
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 28.06% | 18.67% | 13.85% | 5.68% | -14.85% | -1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNZ.DE and XEMD.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EUNZ.DE and XEMD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNZ.DE
XEMD.DE
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNZ.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.50 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 4.60 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.57 | 16.76 | -6.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNZ.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.77 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.58 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than XEMD.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNZ.DE and XEMD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNZ.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -23.50% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -10.72% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.00% | -19.19% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.96% | -2.54% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -9.22% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.95% | -0.82% |
Volatility
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) is 4.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that EUNZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNZ.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 7.39% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 15.08% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 17.84% | -5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 16.76% | -5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 16.76% | -3.44% |
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUNZ.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUNZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 1.55% | 1.92% | 3.01% | 2.38% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNZ.DE and XEMD.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEMD.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility, while XEMD.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EUNZ.DE and 0.18% for XEMD.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNZ.DE and XEMD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer