PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNZ.DE achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than IS0X.DE's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNZ.DE has outperformed IS0X.DE with an annualized return of 6.45%, while IS0X.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.


EUNZ.DE

1D
-0.87%
1M
1.73%
YTD
21.72%
6M
22.09%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
6.45%

IS0X.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
2.13%
YTD
3.22%
6M
3.65%
1Y
6.19%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.04%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
21.72%-0.12%15.71%3.83%-8.85%13.09%-2.49%10.54%-1.87%11.39%
IS0X.DE
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.22%-2.16%7.10%5.53%-11.18%4.80%0.18%14.28%0.50%-4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.26

The correlation between EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (5 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNZ.DE
EUNZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IS0X.DE
IS0X.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IS0X.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0X.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) and iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNZ.DEIS0X.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

2.94

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

6.67

+5.26

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the IS0X.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.03%, which is greater than IS0X.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNZ.DEIS0X.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.03%

-27.33%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-2.08%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.00%

-8.55%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.00%

-13.06%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.16%

-17.31%

-8.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-1.24%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-9.98%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.92%

+1.25%

Volatility

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IS0X.DE) at 1.11%. This indicates that EUNZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS0X.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNZ.DEIS0X.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

1.11%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

3.01%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

4.44%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.61%

6.44%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.34%

8.31%

+5.03%

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IS0X.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNZ.DE vs. IS0X.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS0X.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS0X.DE
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.16%4.22%3.80%3.35%2.65%2.03%2.45%2.68%2.59%2.64%2.57%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS0X.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS0X.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.

EUNZ.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IS0X.DE is Global Corporate Bonds. EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility, while IS0X.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EUNZ.DE and 0.20% for IS0X.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNZ.DE and IS0X.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer