PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNU.DE achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly lower than SYBZ.DE's 0.96% return.


EUNU.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
-0.79%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-0.25%
10Y*

SYBZ.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.50%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUNU.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.39%-4.02%5.70%4.05%-10.69%4.64%0.21%10.21%7.38%
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
0.96%-4.27%3.98%1.41%-11.02%2.85%-0.73%8.89%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

0.82

The correlation between EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNU.DE
EUNU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EUNU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBZ.DE
SYBZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNU.DESYBZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.01

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

0.04

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

0.07

-0.74

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNU.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNU.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

0.02

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.17

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.15

+0.08

Drawdowns

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNU.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum SYBZ.DE drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNU.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-16.33%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

-2.33%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.28%

-7.58%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.88%

-15.01%

+2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.39%

-11.83%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-7.57%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.27%

+0.44%

Volatility

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUNU.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNU.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

2.53%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

3.62%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

6.40%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

6.21%

-0.45%

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNU.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than SYBZ.DE's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EUNU.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.53%3.21%4.10%4.25%1.55%2.78%2.49%2.47%2.10%
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
2.68%2.96%2.51%1.86%1.38%0.98%1.40%1.41%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNU.DE and SYBZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer