PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNN.DE achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly higher than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE has underperformed IUSQ.DE with an annualized return of 9.05%, while IUSQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.


EUNN.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.50%
YTD
16.53%
6M
16.81%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
9.05%

IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
16.53%13.46%12.90%15.16%-11.47%9.25%4.10%22.24%-10.32%10.42%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2011

0.71

The correlation between EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNN.DEIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

4.08

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

16.69

-6.18

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNN.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.31

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.88

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.82

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.76

-0.23

Drawdowns

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNN.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.55%

-33.60%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-6.48%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-21.25%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.41%

-21.25%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-33.60%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.55%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-4.19%

-2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.59%

+1.27%

Volatility

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNN.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.03%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

8.26%

+6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.97%

11.47%

+6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

13.94%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

15.02%

+1.06%

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNN.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNN.DE nor IUSQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

EUNN.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUNN.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNN.DE and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer