EUNN.DE vs. ^N225
EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) is Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI, while ^N225 (Nikkei 225) is an index. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE returned 9.05%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for ^N225. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EUNN.DE is traded in EUR, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNN.DE achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 31.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNN.DE has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 9.05%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
^N225
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 11.08%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 28.62%
- 1Y
- 57.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -10.32% | 10.42% |
^N225 Nikkei 225 | 31.10% | 12.07% | 13.69% | 15.62% | -15.84% | 2.21% | 11.41% | 22.37% | -5.83% | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNN.DE and ^N225 is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2009 | 0.42 |
The correlation between EUNN.DE and ^N225 shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank
EUNN.DE
^N225
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNN.DE | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 4.65 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.51 | 14.18 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNN.DE | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.46 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.48 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.29 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNN.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.55%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -46.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNN.DE and ^N225.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNN.DE | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.55% | -46.30% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -12.80% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -23.03% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.41% | -23.37% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.55% | -30.08% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.55% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.85% | -11.34% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 4.16% | -1.30% |
Volatility
EUNN.DE vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) is 3.16%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that EUNN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNN.DE | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | 7.25% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 19.78% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 24.19% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 22.80% | -6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 20.77% | -4.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNN.DE and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EUNN.DE and ^N225
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer