PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNM.DE is traded in EUR, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than VUAG.L's 9.97% return.


EUNM.DE

1D
3.17%
1M
1.70%
YTD
26.16%
6M
28.73%
1Y
48.04%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
10.07%

VUAG.L

1D
1.40%
1M
0.51%
YTD
9.97%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.16%19.20%14.09%5.71%-14.48%4.68%6.81%15.16%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
9.97%3.66%33.48%22.18%-13.57%39.49%9.91%-10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNM.DE and VUAG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.55

The correlation between EUNM.DE and VUAG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (5 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNM.DEVUAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.39

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.40

3.41

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

12.31

+2.97

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNM.DE and VUAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, roughly equal to the maximum VUAG.L drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and VUAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNM.DEVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-35.04%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.11%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-22.34%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-22.34%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-1.81%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-6.30%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.97%

+1.05%

Volatility

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 3.04%. This indicates that EUNM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNM.DEVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

3.04%

+4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.75%

7.77%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

11.53%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.13%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

18.75%

-0.53%

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNM.DE vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNM.DE nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNM.DE and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EUNM.DE.

EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.07% for VUAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and VUAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer