EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE
EUNM.DE (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while FLXC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUNM.DE returned 8.41%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUNM.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 27.83%
- 1Y
- 48.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.21% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 6.84% | 14.27% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNM.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EUNM.DE and FLXC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNM.DE
FLXC.DE
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNM.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.06 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 0.31 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | 0.64 | +16.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNM.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 0.27 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.15 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.09 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNM.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -55.61% | +19.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -15.19% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -24.70% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | -49.07% | +25.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -30.89% | +28.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.55% | -27.95% | +17.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 7.38% | -4.48% |
Volatility
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) at 6.78%. This indicates that EUNM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNM.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 6.78% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 12.35% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 17.78% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 26.71% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 26.20% | -8.01% |
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUNM.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNM.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNM.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
EUNM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLXC.DE is China Equities. EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer