EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE
EUNM.DE (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) and 5MVL.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - EUNM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while 5MVL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUNM.DE returned 8.41%/yr vs 17.27%/yr for 5MVL.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EUNM.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 5MVL.DE.
Performance
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNM.DE achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly lower than 5MVL.DE's 45.83% return.
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 27.83%
- 1Y
- 48.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
5MVL.DE
- 1D
- -2.48%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 46.38%
- 1Y
- 81.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.27%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.21% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 6.84% | 20.91% | -2.14% |
5MVL.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 45.83% | 27.25% | 21.00% | 14.58% | -10.54% | 13.07% | -2.40% | 20.39% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNM.DE and 5MVL.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EUNM.DE and 5MVL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNM.DE
5MVL.DE
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNM.DE | 5MVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.73 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 8.86 | -4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | 28.83 | -11.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNM.DE | 5MVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 4.31 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.02 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.83 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than 5MVL.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNM.DE and 5MVL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNM.DE | 5MVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -32.25% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.46% | -9.30% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -19.15% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.62% | -20.60% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -3.88% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.55% | -6.27% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.87% | +0.03% |
Volatility
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) is 7.30%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a volatility of 8.71%. This indicates that EUNM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5MVL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNM.DE | 5MVL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 8.71% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 15.83% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 19.13% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 16.78% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 18.84% | -0.65% |
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than 5MVL.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUNM.DE vs. 5MVL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNM.DE nor 5MVL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EUNM.DE and 5MVL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.
EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EUNM.DE and 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNM.DE and 5MVL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer