PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNL.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than WEBN.DE's 12.37% return.


EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%

WEBN.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.63%
YTD
12.37%
6M
12.73%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%9.18%
WEBN.DE
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR
12.37%9.70%8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024

0.93

The correlation between EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

WEBN.DE
WEBN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WEBN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNL.DEWEBN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

4.03

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

16.67

-2.15

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the WEBN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNL.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.28

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.08

-0.26

Drawdowns

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than WEBN.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNL.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-21.22%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-6.63%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.65%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-3.11%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.61%

+0.03%

Volatility

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) is 2.62%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Acc EUR (WEBN.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that EUNL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNL.DEWEBN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.05%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

8.43%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

11.74%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

14.90%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

14.90%

+0.27%

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBN.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNL.DE vs. WEBN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNL.DE nor WEBN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WEBN.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WEBN.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index, while WEBN.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EUNL.DE and 0.07% for WEBN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNL.DE and WEBN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer