PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUNL.DE is traded in EUR, while NATO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NATO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNL.DE achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than NATO.L's 11.99% return.


EUNL.DE

1D
1.66%
1M
2.05%
YTD
9.95%
6M
11.17%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
12.99%

NATO.L

1D
0.00%
1M
6.49%
YTD
11.99%
6M
12.58%
1Y
17.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.95%7.91%25.93%6.55%
NATO.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating
11.99%36.45%40.70%15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNL.DE and NATO.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023

0.62

The correlation between EUNL.DE and NATO.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NATO.L
NATO.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
NATO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNL.DENATO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.39

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.11

3.11

+12.00

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the NATO.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNL.DE and NATO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than NATO.L's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNL.DE and NATO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNL.DENATO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-13.59%

-20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-12.37%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-3.87%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-2.53%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

5.56%

-4.02%

Volatility

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) is 3.08%, while HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF - Accumulating (NATO.L) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that EUNL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNL.DENATO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

6.81%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

16.16%

-8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

20.56%

-9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

19.28%

-5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

19.28%

-4.12%

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NATO.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNL.DE vs. NATO.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNL.DE nor NATO.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNL.DE and NATO.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NATO.L.

EUNL.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while NATO.L is Aerospace & Defense. EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index, while NATO.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EUNL.DE and 0.49% for NATO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNL.DE and NATO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer