PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNL.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.DE's 35.70% return.


EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%

ESIE.DE

1D
-1.24%
1M
1.63%
YTD
35.70%
6M
33.07%
1Y
55.14%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-13.59%32.71%2.01%
ESIE.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
35.70%15.26%-6.63%8.58%35.56%35.47%6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.29

The correlation between EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIE.DE
ESIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNL.DEESIE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

4.45

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

14.31

+0.20

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the ESIE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNL.DEESIE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.40

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.93

-0.11

Drawdowns

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNL.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than ESIE.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNL.DEESIE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-26.20%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

-12.33%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.73%

-26.20%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-26.20%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-6.72%

+6.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-6.68%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

3.84%

-2.20%

Volatility

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) is 2.62%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.DE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that EUNL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNL.DEESIE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

7.06%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

19.84%

-12.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

22.89%

-11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

23.75%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

24.16%

-8.99%

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNL.DE vs. ESIE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNL.DE nor ESIE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

EUNL.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while ESIE.DE is Energy Equities. EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index, while ESIE.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EUNL.DE and 0.18% for ESIE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNL.DE and ESIE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer