PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNJ.DE achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than PR1J.DE's 14.68% return.


EUNJ.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.66%
6M
9.24%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
6.75%

PR1J.DE

1D
-2.32%
1M
-3.26%
6M
7.69%
YTD
14.68%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
12.39%6.55%11.52%1.84%-1.18%12.55%-3.43%14.44%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
14.68%12.92%13.38%16.35%-11.58%10.23%5.10%-99.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.60

The correlation between EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNJ.DE
EUNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1J.DE
PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUNJ.DEPR1J.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.04

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

9.87

-2.35

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, smaller than the maximum PR1J.DE drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNJ.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.94%

-99.34%

+62.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-10.29%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-16.25%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-18.66%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-98.44%

+97.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-97.50%

+90.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

3.18%

-1.01%

Volatility

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) is 2.45%, while Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that EUNJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNJ.DEPR1J.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

6.22%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

16.12%

-7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

19.87%

-7.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.70%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

40.16%

-23.72%

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNJ.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNJ.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than PR1J.DE's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.77%2.95%3.35%3.56%3.92%2.79%2.64%3.52%3.78%3.41%3.31%3.34%
PR1J.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.53%1.75%1.91%1.90%2.21%1.80%1.73%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.

EUNJ.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PR1J.DE is Japan Equities. EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EUNJ.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNJ.DE and PR1J.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer