PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNJ.DE achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EUNJ.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 7.05%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.


EUNJ.DE

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.74%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
7.05%

EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
8.50%6.56%11.50%1.85%-1.18%12.54%-3.43%21.23%-6.37%10.31%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-13.59%32.71%5.48%31.34%-5.13%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2009

0.76

The correlation between EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNJ.DE
EUNJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNJ.DEEUNL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.64

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.18

14.52

-8.34

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNJ.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.12

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.90

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.82

-0.47

Drawdowns

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNJ.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-33.63%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-6.50%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-21.73%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-21.73%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

-33.63%

-3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-0.31%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-4.25%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.64%

+0.49%

Volatility

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that EUNJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNJ.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.62%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

7.72%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

11.16%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

14.17%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

15.17%

+1.37%

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNJ.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUNJ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNJ.DE
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.46%2.95%3.35%3.56%3.92%2.79%2.64%3.52%3.78%3.41%3.31%3.34%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EUNJ.DE.

EUNJ.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for EUNJ.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNJ.DE and EUNL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer