EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE
EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and YCSH.DE (iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while YCSH.DE is a Money Market fund actively managed by iShares. EUNA.DE is passively managed, while YCSH.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, EUNA.DE returned 1.23% vs 1.98% for YCSH.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 2.33%
- 5Y*
- -1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
YCSH.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.00% | 2.91% | -0.21% |
YCSH.DE iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.96% | 2.26% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNA.DE
YCSH.DE
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUNA.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -48.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 14.20 | -13.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 87.84 | -87.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 781.05 | -779.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, which is greater than YCSH.DE's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNA.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -0.07% | -17.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -0.02% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | 0.00% | -8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -0.00% | -6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.00% | +1.03% |
Volatility
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE) at 0.02%. This indicates that EUNA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCSH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNA.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 0.02% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 0.09% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 0.11% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 0.20% | +4.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 0.20% | +4.24% |
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUNA.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNA.DE nor YCSH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
EUNA.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while YCSH.DE is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and YCSH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer