PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than SYBZ.DE's 0.96% return.


EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*

SYBZ.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.52%
1Y
0.08%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%0.12%
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
0.96%-4.27%3.98%1.41%-11.02%2.85%-0.73%8.89%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

0.48

The correlation between EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBZ.DE
SYBZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNA.DESYBZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.01

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.04

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

0.07

+1.11

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the SYBZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNA.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.02

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.17

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.15

-0.20

Drawdowns

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than SYBZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNA.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-16.33%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.33%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-7.58%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-15.01%

-2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.66%

-11.83%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-7.57%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.27%

-0.28%

Volatility

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) at 0.99%. This indicates that EUNA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYBZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNA.DESYBZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.99%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

2.53%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

3.62%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

6.40%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

6.21%

-1.94%

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNA.DE vs. SYBZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SYBZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBZ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF
2.68%2.96%2.51%1.86%1.38%0.98%1.40%1.41%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while SYBZ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and SYBZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer