EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE
EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUNA.DE returned -1.29%/yr vs 21.44%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. EUNA.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.29%
- 1Y
- 1.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 13.02% | -14.92% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNA.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | -0.20 |
The correlation between EUNA.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNA.DE
QDVF.DE
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUNA.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.32 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 2.54 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.18 | 7.98 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUNA.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.82 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.79 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.28 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNA.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -65.81% | +48.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -17.23% | +14.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.02% | -27.13% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.03% | -27.13% | +10.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.66% | -8.92% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -17.41% | +10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 5.49% | -4.50% |
Volatility
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) is 1.35%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that EUNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNA.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 7.70% | -6.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 20.43% | -17.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 24.05% | -20.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 26.95% | -22.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 28.68% | -24.41% |
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EUNA.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNA.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNA.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
EUNA.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EUNA.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer