PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than LYXD.DE's 0.14% return.


EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.29%
1Y
1.18%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*

LYXD.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
0.65%
YTD
0.14%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
0.31%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
-2.13%
10Y*
-0.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%-1.17%-0.54%
LYXD.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.14%1.71%1.17%8.47%-19.30%-2.81%4.17%6.46%1.20%-1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.74

The correlation between EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

LYXD.DE
LYXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LYXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUNA.DELYXD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.02

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.07

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

0.20

+0.98

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the LYXD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUNA.DELYXD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

0.06

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

-0.30

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.64

-0.69

Drawdowns

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum LYXD.DE drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUNA.DELYXD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-22.49%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-4.13%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-4.41%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-22.19%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.66%

-12.65%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-6.28%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.53%

-0.54%

Volatility

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) is 1.35%, while Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYXD.DE) has a volatility of 1.96%. This indicates that EUNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUNA.DELYXD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.96%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

4.10%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

4.87%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.64%

7.19%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.27%

6.12%

-1.85%

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LYXD.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUNA.DE vs. LYXD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUNA.DE nor LYXD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for LYXD.DE.

EUNA.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while LYXD.DE is European Government Bonds. EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while LYXD.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 7-10 Year Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EUNA.DE and 0.17% for LYXD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and LYXD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer