EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE
EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EUNA.DE returned 1.03% vs 16.90% for ASWC.DE. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUNA.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ASWC.DE.
Performance
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 13.04% return.
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.37%
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 16.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.61% | 2.91% | 1.48% | 3.04% |
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNA.DE and ASWC.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EUNA.DE
ASWC.DE
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EUNA.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.16 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 1.36 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 3.10 | -2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, which is greater than ASWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and ASWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUNA.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.81% | -12.58% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -12.58% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -2.83% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -2.47% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 5.51% | -4.50% |
Volatility
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) is 1.34%, while HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that EUNA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUNA.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 5.89% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 15.89% | -12.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 20.35% | -16.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 19.11% | -14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 19.11% | -14.66% |
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUNA.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNA.DE nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EUNA.DE and ASWC.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
EUNA.DE is categorized as Global Bonds, while ASWC.DE is Aerospace & Defense. EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged), while ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EUNA.DE and 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for EUNA.DE and ASWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer