PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUN3.DE is traded in EUR, while AHYB.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AHYB.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN3.DE achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than AHYB.DE's 1.44% return.


EUN3.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
-2.97%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-1.20%

AHYB.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.44%
6M
0.61%
1Y
0.85%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-1.67%-5.37%2.25%0.44%-3.72%
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
1.45%-7.58%8.10%3.80%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022

0.71

The correlation between EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUN3.DE
EUN3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYB.DE
AHYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUN3.DEAHYB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.03

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.18

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

0.47

-1.84

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN3.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the AHYB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUN3.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.74

0.14

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.06

+0.11

Drawdowns

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN3.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than AHYB.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUN3.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-12.85%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-4.60%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.14%

-11.29%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.83%

-7.94%

-13.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-7.10%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.80%

+0.62%

Volatility

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EUN3.DE) is 1.12%, while Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that EUN3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUN3.DEAHYB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.34%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

4.35%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44%

5.90%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

7.95%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

7.95%

-1.72%

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUN3.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYB.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUN3.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Dividend Comparison

EUN3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while AHYB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYB.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUN3.DE
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.50%3.09%2.40%1.47%0.79%0.60%1.08%1.20%1.04%1.01%1.04%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AHYB.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AHYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUN3.DE.

EUN3.DE tracks FTSE G7 Government Bond, while AHYB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EUN3.DE and 0.16% for AHYB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN3.DE and AHYB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer