PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUN0.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUN0.DE achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMES.DE's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN0.DE has underperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 7.39%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.


EUN0.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.71%
YTD
7.42%
6M
7.82%
1Y
10.67%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.39%

AMES.DE

1D
-0.42%
1M
6.08%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.95%
1Y
45.42%
3Y*
32.13%
5Y*
20.59%
10Y*
13.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUN0.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
7.42%12.27%11.42%10.79%-13.21%21.52%-4.02%24.18%-4.36%9.14%
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
14.05%55.41%19.00%26.86%-0.71%6.98%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EUN0.DE and AMES.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2013

0.68

The correlation between EUN0.DE and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUN0.DE
EUN0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EUN0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUN0.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUN0.DEAMES.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.49

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

4.54

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

16.06

-11.48

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUN0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUN0.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUN0.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, smaller than the maximum AMES.DE drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN0.DE and AMES.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUN0.DEAMES.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-40.98%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-9.95%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.73%

-12.58%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

-17.77%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.68%

-40.98%

+10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.52%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-10.09%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.82%

-0.50%

Volatility

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUN0.DE) is 1.79%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that EUN0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUN0.DEAMES.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

4.03%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

14.00%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.85%

16.39%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.02%

16.96%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.28%

18.42%

-6.14%

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EUN0.DE and AMES.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUN0.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUN0.DE nor AMES.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUN0.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUN0.DE and AMES.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

EUN0.DE tracks MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUN0.DE and AMES.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer