PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (EUIN.DE) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EUIN.DE is traded in EUR, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUIN.DE achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than RMAU.L's 4.88% return.


EUIN.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
1.01%
YTD
4.14%
6M
2.84%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
2.04%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*

RMAU.L

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.88%
6M
6.28%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
27.87%
5Y*
19.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EUIN.DE
Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc
4.14%0.24%2.06%1.02%10.68%7.29%-2.03%
RMAU.L
The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities
4.90%45.04%34.28%9.89%6.00%3.03%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EUIN.DE and RMAU.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2020

-0.04

The correlation between EUIN.DE and RMAU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUIN.DE
EUIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EUIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

RMAU.L
RMAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RMAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RMAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (EUIN.DE) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUIN.DERMAU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.69

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

4.47

-3.04

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the RMAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUIN.DE and RMAU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUIN.DERMAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

1.24

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.17

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.78

-0.34

Drawdowns

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -10.70%, smaller than the maximum RMAU.L drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUIN.DE and RMAU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUIN.DERMAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.70%

-21.94%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-17.61%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.38%

-17.61%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.38%

-17.61%

+12.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-15.40%

+14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.72%

-6.32%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

6.69%

-4.94%

Volatility

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (EUIN.DE) is 2.07%, while The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that EUIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUIN.DERMAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

5.91%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

21.30%

-16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.33%

24.08%

-16.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.81%

16.97%

-12.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.04%

20.55%

-16.51%

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUIN.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUIN.DE vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUIN.DE nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUIN.DE and RMAU.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EUIN.DE.

EUIN.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while RMAU.L is Commodities. EUIN.DE tracks iBoxx EUR Breakeven Euro-Inflation France & Germany, while RMAU.L tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EUIN.DE and 0.22% for RMAU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUIN.DE and RMAU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer