PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in PIMCO Euro Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EUHA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUHA.DE achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 19.71% return.


EUHA.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.81%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*

EUNN.DE

1D
0.54%
1M
3.39%
YTD
19.71%
6M
19.97%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUHA.DE
PIMCO Euro Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
1.71%5.15%6.20%10.03%-8.20%3.13%1.06%8.43%-4.19%0.30%
EUNN.DE
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF
19.71%13.46%12.91%15.16%-11.48%9.24%4.12%22.22%-10.32%6.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2017

0.38

The correlation between EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUHA.DE
EUHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EUHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNN.DE
EUNN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Euro Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EUHA.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUHA.DEEUNN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.91

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

13.04

-6.99

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUHA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the EUNN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.38%, smaller than the maximum EUNN.DE drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUHA.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-28.56%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-9.58%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.46%

-15.81%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.40%

-19.41%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.49%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-6.84%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.88%

-2.19%

Volatility

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Euro Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (EUHA.DE) is 0.68%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that EUHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUHA.DEEUNN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

5.61%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

15.36%

-12.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

18.63%

-15.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

16.20%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.44%

16.10%

-9.66%

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUHA.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EUHA.DE nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EUHA.DE.

EUHA.DE is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. EUHA.DE tracks BofA Merrill Lynch 0-5 Year Euro Developed Markets High Yield 2% Constrained, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EUHA.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUHA.DE and EUNN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer