EUFN vs. KTEC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EUFN (iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF) and KTEC (KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EUFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Financials Index, while KTEC is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUFN returned 18.43%/yr vs -11.24%/yr for KTEC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EUFN charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for KTEC.

Performance

EUFN vs. KTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFN achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than KTEC's -16.16% return.

EUFN

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 3.32%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 26.28%
• 3Y*: 32.04%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

KTEC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -11.70%
• YTD: -16.16%
• 6M: -17.79%
• 1Y: -16.98%
• 3Y*: 3.50%
• 5Y*: -11.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFN vs. KTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF	4.75%	65.73%	17.20%	26.15%	-8.78%	-1.35%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	-16.16%	21.01%	16.13%	-10.41%	-26.12%	-29.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFN and KTEC is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021	0.40

EUFN vs. KTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EUFN	KTEC
Financial Services	97.1%	-
Technology	1.0%	21.3%
Industrials	0.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	48.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	27.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EUFN vs. KTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFN

EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 42
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

KTEC

KTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5
KTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFN vs. KTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) and KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EUFN	KTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	-0.61	+1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	-0.75	+2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.92	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	-0.56	+2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.24	-1.00	+7.24

EUFN vs. KTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the KTEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFN and KTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EUFN vs. KTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFN drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, smaller than the maximum KTEC drawdown of -66.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFN and KTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUFN	KTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.25%	-66.90%	+13.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.77%	-30.47%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.95%	-34.71%	+18.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.15%	-66.90%	+31.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-47.09%	+46.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-43.95%	+29.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	16.97%	-12.74%

Volatility

EUFN vs. KTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) is 6.96%, while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that EUFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUFN	KTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	9.07%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.05%	20.61%	-3.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	28.01%	-7.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	43.16%	-21.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.53%	43.11%	-18.58%

EUFN vs. KTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFN has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than KTEC's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

EUFN vs. KTEC - Dividend Comparison

EUFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than KTEC's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUFN iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF	3.41%	3.57%	5.36%	5.00%	4.24%	4.15%	1.38%	4.55%	6.48%	3.04%	4.03%	3.65%
KTEC KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF	4.00%	3.36%	0.27%	0.81%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUFN and KTEC in my portfolio?

EUFN and KTEC have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUFN or KTEC?

KTEC has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to EUFN (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUFN dropped -53.25% vs KTEC's -66.90%.

Which ETF is better, EUFN or KTEC?

On 5-year performance, EUFN leads with 18.43% vs -11.24% for KTEC. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EUFN or KTEC?

Over the 5-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 18.43% return vs -11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EUFN or KTEC?

EUFN is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for KTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EUFN or KTEC?

KTEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 3.41% for EUFN.

What is the main difference between EUFN and KTEC?

EUFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while KTEC is China Equities. EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index, while KTEC tracks Hang Seng Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EUFN and 0.69% for KTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EUFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.