PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUFM.L vs. UC81.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUFM.L achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly higher than UC81.L's 0.48% return.


EUFM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.81%
YTD
6.74%
6M
8.89%
1Y
16.80%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

UC81.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.19%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
2.64%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
6.74%29.59%3.25%15.45%-7.82%13.50%5.84%19.11%-12.29%
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.48%-0.20%6.44%0.38%4.76%0.32%1.51%4.23%4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EUFM.L and UC81.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018

-0.00

The correlation between EUFM.L and UC81.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (3 years) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUFM.L
EUFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

UC81.L
UC81.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UC81.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC81.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC81.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UC81.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC81.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUFM.LUC81.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.24

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

3.19

+2.50

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the UC81.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUFM.L and UC81.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUFM.LUC81.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

0.91

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.41

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Drawdowns

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUFM.L drawdown since its inception was -30.14%, which is greater than UC81.L's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFM.L and UC81.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUFM.LUC81.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.14%

-14.94%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-4.29%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-8.01%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-14.31%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-2.57%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-5.56%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.67%

+1.28%

Volatility

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) at 1.51%. This indicates that EUFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC81.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUFM.LUC81.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

1.51%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

4.27%

+6.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

5.82%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

7.78%

+6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

9.16%

+6.97%

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUFM.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UC81.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUFM.L vs. UC81.L - Dividend Comparison

EUFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC81.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC81.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
4.67%5.59%4.77%3.28%1.36%1.58%2.75%2.90%2.20%2.16%1.86%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUFM.L and UC81.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC81.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC81.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.

EUFM.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC81.L is Corporate Bonds. EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC81.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for EUFM.L and 0.18% for UC81.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUFM.L and UC81.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer