EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L
EUFM.L (UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EUFM.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EUFM.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EUFM.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUFM.L achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.
EUFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 6.74% | 29.59% | 3.25% | 15.45% | -7.82% | 4.89% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUFM.L and LDEG.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, EUFM.L and LDEG.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.65, meaning their price movements have been converging.
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Utilities
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Technology
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Defensive
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Healthcare
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Communication Services
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Energy
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EUFM.L
LDEG.L
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EUFM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.48 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 3.78 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 13.82 | -8.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EUFM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.63 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.24 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.24 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUFM.L drawdown since its inception was -30.14%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUFM.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EUFM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.14% | -15.97% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -8.04% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -12.05% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.86% | -15.97% | -4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -1.33% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -2.95% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.20% | +0.75% |
Volatility
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that EUFM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EUFM.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.57% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 9.21% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 11.55% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 15.99% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 16.01% | +0.12% |
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUFM.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EUFM.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
EUFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EUFM.L and LDEG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LDEG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.
EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for EUFM.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for EUFM.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer