PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDG vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUDG vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDG achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 8.62% return.


EUDG

1D
-1.04%
1M
2.52%
YTD
1.93%
6M
4.90%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.97%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDG vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.93%28.94%-4.30%19.36%-18.24%16.87%11.29%28.52%-14.47%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDG and NTSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.69

The correlation between EUDG and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUDG vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUDG
NTSX

Industrials

23.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

17.7%
8.4%

Financial Services

15.2%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

12.2%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.1%

Technology

5.1%
35.1%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
12.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.4%

Utilities

1.8%
2.1%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.5%

Industrials

EUDG
23.8%
NTSX
7.7%

Healthcare

EUDG
17.7%
NTSX
8.4%

Financial Services

EUDG
15.2%
NTSX
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

EUDG
12.2%
NTSX
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EUDG
12.2%
NTSX
10.1%

Technology

EUDG
5.1%
NTSX
35.1%

Energy

EUDG
4.4%
NTSX
3.5%

Communication Services

EUDG
4.3%
NTSX
12.5%

Basic Materials

EUDG
3.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Utilities

EUDG
1.8%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

EUDG
0.1%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUDG vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDG
EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDG vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EUDGNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.77

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

12.25

-9.07

EUDG vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDG and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EUDGNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.06

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.57

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.71

-0.37

Drawdowns

EUDG vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDG drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDG and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDGNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-31.34%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-9.16%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-16.82%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-31.34%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.00%

-1.05%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-6.79%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

2.07%

+1.66%

Volatility

EUDG vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that EUDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDGNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.39%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

9.58%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

12.31%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

17.04%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

18.27%

-0.57%

EUDG vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUDG vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

EUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.25%2.19%2.41%2.14%3.07%2.98%1.87%2.30%3.00%1.55%2.49%2.10%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDG and NTSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUDG has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDG dropped -33.76% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 4.73% for EUDG. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for EUDG.

EUDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

EUDG is categorized as Europe Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for EUDG and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDG and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer