PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDG vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUDG vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDG achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 2.53% return. Over the past 10 years, EUDG has underperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 8.98%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


EUDG

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.16%
6M
3.28%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
8.98%

FSZ

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.06%
YTD
2.53%
6M
1.73%
1Y
11.07%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDG vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
3.16%28.94%-4.30%19.36%-18.24%16.87%11.29%28.52%-15.19%29.66%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDG and FSZ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2014

0.78

The correlation between EUDG and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EUDG vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EUDG
FSZ

Industrials

18.7%
17.1%

Healthcare

17.6%
14.6%

Financial Services

15.0%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.7%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.4%

Energy

3.9%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%
9.8%

Technology

2.6%
4.9%

Utilities

1.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.4%

Industrials

EUDG
18.7%
FSZ
17.1%

Healthcare

EUDG
17.6%
FSZ
14.6%

Financial Services

EUDG
15.0%
FSZ
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EUDG
12.2%
FSZ
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

EUDG
11.7%
FSZ
4.9%

Communication Services

EUDG
4.2%
FSZ
2.4%

Energy

EUDG
3.9%
FSZ

-

Basic Materials

EUDG
3.3%
FSZ
9.8%

Technology

EUDG
2.6%
FSZ
4.9%

Utilities

EUDG
1.6%
FSZ
2.4%

Real Estate

EUDG
0.1%
FSZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUDG vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDG
EUDG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
EUDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDG vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUDGFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

2.61

+1.20

EUDG vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDG and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUDG vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDG drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FSZ drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDG and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDGFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-33.97%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-10.39%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

-13.93%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-33.96%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.76%

-33.97%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-4.66%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-6.98%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

4.24%

-0.45%

Volatility

EUDG vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund (EUDG) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) at 4.07%. This indicates that EUDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDGFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.07%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

11.05%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

14.34%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

19.35%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

18.75%

-1.36%

EUDG vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUDG has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EUDG vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

EUDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FSZ's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDG
WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.22%2.19%2.41%2.14%3.07%2.98%1.87%2.30%3.00%1.55%2.49%2.10%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.38%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDG and FSZ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUDG has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to FSZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDG dropped -33.76% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 10.25% vs 8.98% for EUDG. On fees, EUDG is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FSZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 8.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUDG is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

FSZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 2.22% for EUDG.

EUDG tracks WisdomTree Europe Quality Dividend Growth Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for EUDG and 0.80% for FSZ.

EUDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDG and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer