PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUCO.L vs. JR15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and JPM EUR 1-5 Year IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (JR15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EUCO.L having a 0.44% return and JR15.L slightly higher at 0.45%.


EUCO.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.44%
1Y
1.25%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
0.76%

JR15.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.24%
6M
0.24%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
1.52%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EUCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.44%2.90%4.47%7.64%-13.68%-1.22%2.64%6.22%0.28%
JR15.L
JPM EUR 1-5 Year IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.45%3.45%4.35%6.21%-7.76%-0.38%0.84%2.40%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EUCO.L and JR15.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2018

0.82

The correlation between EUCO.L and JR15.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUCO.L
EUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JR15.L
JR15.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JR15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JR15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JR15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JR15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JR15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) and JPM EUR 1-5 Year IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (JR15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUCO.LJR15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.16

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

0.77

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

2.77

-1.21

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the JR15.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUCO.L and JR15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -17.53%, which is greater than JR15.L's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUCO.L and JR15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUCO.LJR15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.53%

-10.19%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-1.97%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.67%

-1.97%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.53%

-10.19%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-0.57%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-2.18%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.55%

+0.25%

Volatility

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUCO.L) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to JPM EUR 1-5 Year IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (JR15.L) at 0.51%. This indicates that EUCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JR15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUCO.LJR15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.51%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

1.80%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

1.95%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

2.56%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

3.11%

+1.34%

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUCO.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than JR15.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EUCO.L vs. JR15.L - Dividend Comparison

EUCO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while JR15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUCO.L
SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.26%3.25%3.07%2.13%0.96%0.89%0.86%0.92%0.89%1.21%1.36%1.71%
JR15.L
JPM EUR 1-5 Year IG Corporate Bond Active UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EUCO.L and JR15.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JR15.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JR15.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for EUCO.L.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for EUCO.L and 0.04% for JR15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUCO.L and JR15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer