ETTGX vs. BDJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ).
ETTGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 1996. BDJ is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2005.
Performance
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | -5.61% | 16.69% | 25.16% | 28.24% | -20.11% | 24.69% | 23.05% | 29.32% | -5.28% | 22.35% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | -5.83% | 26.12% | 16.87% | -6.67% | 0.83% | 26.56% | -7.58% | 37.43% | -10.42% | 20.78% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ETTGX having a -5.61% return and BDJ slightly lower at -5.83%. Over the past 10 years, ETTGX has outperformed BDJ with an annualized return of 13.45%, while BDJ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.93% annualized return.
ETTGX
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
BDJ
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETTGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETTGX vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank
ETTGX
BDJ
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETTGX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.69 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.04 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.97 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 3.62 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETTGX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.69 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.54 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETTGX and BDJ is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison
ETTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than BDJ's 9.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETTGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund | 3.16% | 2.98% | 2.11% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.35% | 0.62% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.88% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 9.78% | 9.03% | 8.21% | 9.49% | 12.18% | 5.95% | 7.08% | 6.66% | 7.21% | 6.07% | 6.88% | 7.36% |
Drawdowns
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETTGX drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETTGX and BDJ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETTGX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -59.46% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -12.28% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | -21.39% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.98% | -48.14% | +15.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -9.16% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -8.99% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.29% | -0.53% |
Volatility
ETTGX vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.1 Fund (ETTGX) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETTGX | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.62% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 9.50% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 16.68% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 16.13% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 18.38% | -0.07% |