PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETSZ.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than LCEU.DE's 4.87% return.


ETSZ.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.24%
6M
9.76%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
9.16%

LCEU.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
3.09%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.28%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ETSZ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.24%20.43%8.21%15.61%3.93%
LCEU.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF
4.87%9.84%5.83%14.59%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2022

0.95

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETSZ.DE
ETSZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LCEU.DE
LCEU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LCEU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCEU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETSZ.DELCEU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.88

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

2.91

+3.54

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the LCEU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETSZ.DELCEU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.71

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.73

-0.21

Drawdowns

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETSZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than LCEU.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETSZ.DELCEU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-16.38%

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-10.37%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-16.38%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.59%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-2.92%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.13%

-0.62%

Volatility

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB UCITS ETF (LCEU.DE) at 4.11%. This indicates that ETSZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCEU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETSZ.DELCEU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.11%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

10.36%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

12.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

13.14%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

13.14%

+2.40%

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETSZ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LCEU.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETSZ.DE vs. LCEU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETSZ.DE nor LCEU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ETSZ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETSZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCEU.DE.

ETSZ.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while LCEU.DE tracks Low Carbon 100 Europe PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETSZ.DE and 0.30% for LCEU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETSZ.DE and LCEU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer