PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETSZ.DE achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly lower than EMEH.DE's 21.33% return.


ETSZ.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.24%
6M
9.76%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
9.16%

EMEH.DE

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
21.33%
6M
24.96%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETSZ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
7.24%20.43%8.21%15.61%-10.31%24.89%-1.49%28.86%-11.18%0.12%
EMEH.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
21.33%25.40%6.63%-12.26%11.15%27.11%-4.42%7.62%-90.10%4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017

0.23

The correlation between ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETSZ.DE
ETSZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETSZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEH.DE
EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETSZ.DEEMEH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

4.95

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

14.34

-7.89

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETSZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETSZ.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.47

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.48

+1.00

Drawdowns

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETSZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -92.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETSZ.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-92.42%

+56.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-8.89%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.35%

-12.28%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-32.73%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-80.34%

+78.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-81.38%

+75.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

3.08%

-0.57%

Volatility

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (ETSZ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETSZ.DEEMEH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

15.95%

-5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

17.83%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

17.50%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

34.16%

-18.62%

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETSZ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETSZ.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETSZ.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETSZ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETSZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

ETSZ.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while EMEH.DE is Commodities. ETSZ.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ETSZ.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETSZ.DE and EMEH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer