ETR vs. BNS
ETR (Entergy Corporation) and BNS (The Bank of Nova Scotia) are both stocks. ETR operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while BNS operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ETR returned 14.69%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for BNS. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ETR vs. BNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETR achieves a 18.50% return, which is significantly lower than BNS's 22.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ETR has outperformed BNS with an annualized return of 14.69%, while BNS has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
ETR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- YTD
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.64%
BNS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 65.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $182.51M | $239.35M | $211.32M | |
| $334.62M | $310.99M | $399.15M |
ETR vs. BNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETR Entergy Corporation | 18.50% | 25.34% | 55.96% | -6.09% | 3.55% | 17.12% | -13.73% | 44.31% | 10.60% | 15.91% |
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 22.90% | 45.11% | 17.55% | 8.53% | -28.05% | 40.62% | 1.70% | 17.49% | -18.28% | 21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETR and BNS is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1999 | 0.25 |
The correlation between ETR and BNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ETR:
$50.22B
BNS:
$107.00B
ETR:
$3.97
BNS:
CA$8.44
ETR:
27.14
BNS:
14.58
ETR:
3.66
BNS:
1.97
ETR:
2.75
BNS:
1.44
ETR:
$13.48B
BNS:
CA$70.57B
ETR:
$5.25B
BNS:
CA$33.43B
ETR:
$5.85B
BNS:
CA$13.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETR vs. BNS — Risk / Return Rank
ETR
BNS
ETR vs. BNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entergy Corporation (ETR) and The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETR | BNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.64 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.88 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 18.84 | -12.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETR vs. BNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETR drawdown since its inception was -71.72%, which is greater than BNS's maximum drawdown of -63.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETR and BNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETR | BNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.72% | -63.65% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -13.36% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.56% | -19.51% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -39.12% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.99% | -46.29% | +4.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.78% | -2.79% | -4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.20% | -10.96% | -14.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.45% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ETR vs. BNS - Volatility Comparison
Entergy Corporation (ETR) and The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETR | BNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 6.72% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.33% | 13.96% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.86% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 19.56% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 21.91% | +2.26% |
Dividends
ETR vs. BNS - Dividend Comparison
ETR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than BNS's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.62% | 4.17% | 5.85% | 8.56% | 6.39% | 5.09% | 4.93% | 3.53% | 6.34% | 4.80% | 5.24% | 8.13% |
ETR Entergy Corporation | 2.95% | 2.64% | 3.03% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.43% | 3.75% | 3.06% | 4.16% | 4.30% | 4.65% | 4.89% |
Financials
ETR vs. BNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Entergy Corporation and The Bank of Nova Scotia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ETR vs. BNS - Profitability Comparison
ETR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Entergy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 3.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
BNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a gross profit of 8.40B and revenue of 17.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
ETR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Entergy Corporation reported an operating income of 834.73M and revenue of 3.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
BNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported an operating income of 3.43B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
ETR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Entergy Corporation reported a net income of 487.82M and revenue of 3.52B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.
BNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a net income of 2.59B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETR and BNS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNS has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to ETR (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETR dropped -71.72% vs BNS's -63.65%.
BNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETR and BNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer