ETR vs. WM
Compare and contrast key facts about Entergy Corporation (ETR) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ETR or WM.
Correlation
The correlation between ETR and WM is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ETR vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ETR:
2.35
WM:
0.54
ETR:
3.31
WM:
0.84
ETR:
1.51
WM:
1.12
ETR:
6.30
WM:
0.92
ETR:
16.65
WM:
2.07
ETR:
3.82%
WM:
5.29%
ETR:
27.09%
WM:
20.12%
ETR:
-52.99%
WM:
-77.85%
ETR:
-3.73%
WM:
-3.60%
Fundamentals
ETR:
$36.60B
WM:
$91.52B
ETR:
$2.45
WM:
$6.81
ETR:
34.68
WM:
33.40
ETR:
1.52
WM:
2.84
ETR:
3.08
WM:
4.15
ETR:
2.41
WM:
11.15
ETR:
$9.09B
WM:
$16.90B
ETR:
$3.90B
WM:
$6.12B
ETR:
$4.07B
WM:
$4.92B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETR achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 13.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ETR has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 12.43%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.20% annualized return.
ETR
12.41%
0.59%
26.93%
63.09%
16.05%
12.43%
WM
13.56%
-0.27%
11.18%
8.89%
20.32%
18.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ETR vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ETR
WM
ETR vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entergy Corporation (ETR) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ETR vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
ETR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than WM's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETR Entergy Corporation | 2.75% | 3.03% | 4.29% | 3.64% | 3.43% | 3.75% | 3.06% | 4.16% | 4.30% | 4.65% | 4.89% | 3.80% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.35% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
ETR vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETR drawdown since its inception was -52.99%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETR and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ETR vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
Entergy Corporation (ETR) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 7.94%. This indicates that ETR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ETR vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Entergy Corporation and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities