PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETOHX vs. EELDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETOHX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ETOHX has underperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 2.03%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.


ETOHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.78%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
2.03%

EELDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.78%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.02%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETOHX
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund
1.58%4.00%1.45%4.85%-8.30%0.94%5.43%8.09%0.88%4.54%
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
6.66%15.80%14.87%11.46%-6.14%1.55%7.44%18.34%-4.27%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETOHX and EELDX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.08

The correlation between ETOHX and EELDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETOHX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETOHX
ETOHX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ETOHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETOHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETOHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ETOHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETOHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EELDX
EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETOHXEELDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

2.49

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

5.22

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

21.28

-13.10

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETOHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETOHX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETOHXEELDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

5.55

-3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

1.76

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

1.69

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.39

-0.55

Drawdowns

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETOHX drawdown since its inception was -21.71%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETOHX and EELDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETOHXEELDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.71%

-19.12%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-3.68%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

-3.98%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-17.35%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.00%

-19.12%

+6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.90%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.90%

-0.09%

Volatility

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund (ETOHX) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.60%. This indicates that ETOHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETOHXEELDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.60%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

3.03%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

3.46%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.89%

4.61%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

4.74%

-0.54%

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETOHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETOHX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

ETOHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than EELDX's 10.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
10.78%9.44%8.58%9.02%9.17%7.87%7.71%7.86%8.16%7.90%4.12%1.65%
ETOHX
Eaton Vance Ohio Municipal Income Fund
3.44%4.24%3.62%2.42%2.81%2.56%2.77%3.40%3.11%3.42%3.58%3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETOHX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETOHX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to EELDX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETOHX dropped -21.71% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.55 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETOHX and EELDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer