PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETNJX vs. EISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (ETNJX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETNJX achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ETNJX has underperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 2.26%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.


ETNJX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.17%
1Y
8.72%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.26%

EISMX

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
-2.21%
1Y
-4.49%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETNJX
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Fund
1.88%4.21%2.12%5.13%-9.80%1.34%5.40%8.62%2.00%4.78%
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
-1.95%-5.66%17.64%14.01%-8.77%22.02%11.31%34.37%-5.55%24.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ETNJX and EISMX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2002

-0.02

The correlation between ETNJX and EISMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETNJX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETNJX
ETNJX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ETNJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETNJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETNJX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ETNJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETNJX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EISMX
EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (ETNJX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETNJXEISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

0.97

+0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

-0.25

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.40

-0.48

+11.89

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETNJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETNJX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETNJXEISMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

-0.24

+3.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.23

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.51

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.53

+0.41

Drawdowns

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETNJX drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETNJX and EISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETNJXEISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-45.32%

+14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-14.66%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-19.39%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.70%

-19.81%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.70%

-39.95%

+25.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-12.84%

+12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-5.83%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

7.44%

-6.69%

Volatility

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (ETNJX) is 1.14%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that ETNJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETNJXEISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.90%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

11.10%

-8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

15.31%

-12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.05%

17.11%

-13.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

18.86%

-14.64%

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETNJX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETNJX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

ETNJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than EISMX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
6.55%6.43%7.26%2.78%10.37%10.49%9.80%6.52%7.20%3.30%3.58%6.70%
ETNJX
Eaton Vance New Jersey Municipal Income Fund
3.31%4.16%3.49%2.40%2.53%2.37%2.71%3.27%3.39%3.56%3.62%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETNJX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EISMX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to ETNJX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETNJX dropped -31.32% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

ETNJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETNJX and EISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer