PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETMGX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETMGX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ETMGX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 7.56%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


ETMGX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
1.62%
6M
0.06%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
7.56%

NASDX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.16%
YTD
21.03%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
32.52%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
1.62%-6.63%11.43%11.06%-16.53%20.91%12.33%27.32%-5.86%15.26%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.03%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ETMGX and NASDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between ETMGX and NASDX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETMGX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETMGX
ETMGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ETMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ETMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETMGXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.44

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

3.52

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.36

13.66

-14.02

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETMGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETMGX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETMGXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

2.60

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.87

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.00

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.33

+0.15

Drawdowns

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETMGX drawdown since its inception was -37.02%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETMGX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETMGXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-83.16%

+46.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-11.90%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-22.71%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-35.33%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

-35.33%

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.90%

-0.29%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-34.37%

+27.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

3.06%

+2.79%

Volatility

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETMGXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.52%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

12.19%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

16.10%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.75%

23.05%

-4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

22.68%

-2.76%

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETMGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETMGX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

ETMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than NASDX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
6.93%7.04%2.85%1.36%2.80%8.28%0.09%6.50%7.75%11.87%6.00%5.50%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.99%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETMGX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to ETMGX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETMGX dropped -37.02% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETMGX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer