ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE
ETLZ.DE (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) and RS2K.DE (Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ETLZ.DE tracks the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Net Tax Index while RS2K.DE tracks the Russell 2000®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ETLZ.DE returned 10.75%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for RS2K.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETLZ.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RS2K.DE.
Performance
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETLZ.DE having a 21.33% return and RS2K.DE slightly higher at 21.87%. Over the past 10 years, ETLZ.DE has outperformed RS2K.DE with an annualized return of 10.75%, while RS2K.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.
ETLZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 15.70%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
RS2K.DE
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 1Y
- 36.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLZ.DE L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc | 21.33% | 0.32% | 15.12% | 16.03% | -14.22% | 30.61% | 8.11% | 28.84% | -9.27% | 0.58% |
RS2K.DE Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR | 21.87% | 1.29% | 15.87% | 14.96% | -16.48% | 24.69% | 8.27% | 29.13% | -8.90% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLZ.DE and RS2K.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.98 |
The correlation between ETLZ.DE and RS2K.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLZ.DE
RS2K.DE
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE) and Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETLZ.DE | RS2K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.33 | 4.29 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 12.62 | +3.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, which is greater than RS2K.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLZ.DE and RS2K.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLZ.DE | RS2K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.36% | -41.14% | -17.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -8.50% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -32.48% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -32.48% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -41.14% | +0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -2.55% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -9.09% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.89% | -0.54% |
Volatility
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (ETLZ.DE) and Amundi Russell 2000 UCITS ETF EUR (RS2K.DE) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLZ.DE | RS2K.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.36% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 12.48% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 18.21% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 20.98% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 21.60% | -0.60% |
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLZ.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RS2K.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETLZ.DE vs. RS2K.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLZ.DE nor RS2K.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ETLZ.DE and RS2K.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLZ.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RS2K.DE.
ETLZ.DE tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Net Tax Index, while RS2K.DE tracks Russell 2000®. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ETLZ.DE and 0.35% for RS2K.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLZ.DE and RS2K.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer