ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE
ETLR.DE (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) and ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLR.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap, while ENTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETLR.DE returned 35.59% vs 30.75% for ENTR.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETLR.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ENTR.DE.
Performance
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLR.DE achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than ENTR.DE's 6.68% return.
ETLR.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- 6.68%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 30.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETLR.DE L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 18.40% | 12.49% |
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.68% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLR.DE and ENTR.DE is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLR.DE
ENTR.DE
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) and L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETLR.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.18 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 10.08 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLR.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.65%, which is greater than ENTR.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLR.DE and ENTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLR.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.65% | -13.89% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -9.72% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -7.86% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.89% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.06% | +0.15% |
Volatility
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) at 3.87%. This indicates that ETLR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLR.DE | ENTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.87% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 14.17% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.75% | 17.01% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 16.34% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 16.34% | +0.57% |
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLR.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ENTR.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETLR.DE vs. ENTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLR.DE nor ENTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETLR.DE and ENTR.DE have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLR.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ETLR.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ENTR.DE is Commodities. ETLR.DE tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap, while ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLR.DE and 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLR.DE and ENTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer