ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) and WEBG.DE (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist) are both Global Equities funds - ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap while WEBG.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETLQ.DE returned 23.85% vs 26.64% for WEBG.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ETLQ.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for WEBG.DE.

Performance

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLQ.DE achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than WEBG.DE's 12.80% return.

ETLQ.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

WEBG.DE

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 12.74%
• 1Y: 26.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.88%	8.14%	16.89%
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist	12.80%	9.19%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.98

The correlation between ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLQ.DE

ETLQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ETLQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ETLQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETLQ.DE	WEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.33	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.26	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.44	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.11	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.23	16.53	-2.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the WEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETLQ.DE	WEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.33	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	1.24	-0.31

Drawdowns

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, which is greater than WEBG.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETLQ.DE	WEBG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.38%	-21.31%	-12.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	-6.50%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.63%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-2.81%	-1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.62%	+0.06%

Volatility

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) is 2.68%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist (WEBG.DE) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that ETLQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETLQ.DE	WEBG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	3.10%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.77%	8.28%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.18%	11.48%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.06%	14.15%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	14.15%	+1.59%

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLQ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBG.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ETLQ.DE vs. WEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLQ.DE nor WEBG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%
WEBG.DE Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Dist	1.22%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ETLQ.DE or WEBG.DE?

On fees, WEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETLQ.DE or WEBG.DE?

WEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.

What is the main difference between ETLQ.DE and WEBG.DE?

ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap, while WEBG.DE tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLQ.DE and 0.07% for WEBG.DE.