PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLN.DE achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than XMLD.DE's 42.18% return.


ETLN.DE

1D
0.40%
1M
1.13%
YTD
7.75%
6M
9.98%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
13.52%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

XMLD.DE

1D
-0.78%
1M
19.30%
YTD
42.18%
6M
38.22%
1Y
72.24%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLN.DE
L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF
7.75%20.59%6.45%18.04%-12.23%25.18%1.20%0.78%
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.18%16.99%25.17%54.28%-36.45%19.09%51.75%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019

0.56

The correlation between ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLN.DE
ETLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ETLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XMLD.DE
XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLN.DEXMLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

4.62

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

12.52

-6.54

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLN.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.76

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.82

-0.13

Drawdowns

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum XMLD.DE drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLN.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-42.81%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.09%

-15.80%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-33.67%

+16.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-42.81%

+20.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.30%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-13.51%

+8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

5.84%

-3.11%

Volatility

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) is 4.39%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that ETLN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLN.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

10.34%

-5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

19.89%

-8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.84%

26.47%

-12.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

27.22%

-12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

28.52%

-11.75%

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLN.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLD.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLN.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLN.DE nor XMLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETLN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

ETLN.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XMLD.DE is Technology Equities. ETLN.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap, while XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLN.DE and 0.49% for XMLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLN.DE and XMLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer